Scope Coordination metadata only · never CAD, geometries, or program-name technical data · ITAR + EAR boundaries respected end to end.
Setup · about three minutes

Let's thread your week.

Connect the coordination tools you already use, confirm the boundary your compliance team controls, then open a week that's already aligned. The controlled engineering data never leaves the systems it lives in today.

DATUM
Strategic Programs CRESTLINE AEROSYSTEMS

Coordination layer ON

Controlled technical data OFF · LOCKED
Step 1 · Connect

Connect the tools you already coordinate in.

Each tool holds one piece of the week. We read the coordination metadata · who, when, status · and thread it into one view per program. We never reach past that into engineering, quality, or cost systems. Connections are read-only and US-person-scoped.

Outlook · customer + program mail Connected
Teams · cross-plant coordination chat Connected
Calendar · visit cadence, gate reviews, syncs Connected
Travel · FAT / runoff + customer-visit itineraries Authorizing…
AIP reporting · quarterly status narrative Authorizing…
CAD · drawings · PLM · quality records · cost Never ingested · stays in your PLM

Four sources read on day one. Two finish authorizing in the background. The last row is the boundary, and it stays off by design.

Step 2 · Boundary

Confirm the boundary your compliance team controls.

Before anything is threaded, your IT and compliance teams set what's in scope and what's locked out. The ingest boundary is a locked, auditable config · coordination tools on, controlled technical data off and unchangeable from inside the product. You can review the audit trail any time.

The ingest boundary

Set at install · auditable
Calendars + customer-visit cadence Threaded
Internal ops chat (non-engineering) Threaded
Travel + industry-event prep Threaded
AIP reporting narrative Threaded
CAD · drawings · geometries · BOMs Locked out
Quality records (FAI, NCR) · anything CUI Locked out

Why this is the product

A tool that touches controlled technical data is a security-team problem. A coordination layer that sits outside that line is adoptable by design.
The boundary is enforced at ingest, not by trust. The controlled sources are never connected, so no view can surface a field that was never read.
Open the scope + data page → review the locked config and the mock audit log.
Review scope + data
Step 3 · Preview

Here's the week we threaded for you.

Three programs across three phases, already woven from the tools above. Nothing here is engineering content · it's the existence, timing, owner, and status of the coordination work. This is the week you'll open next.

Customer A · wide-body program
Phase F · Execution → gate review

A west-coast factory visit on the calendar, a visit-agenda thread reopened by the program office, and an AIP cadence note that references this program. Threaded into one view.

Next: confirm the site visit · this week
Customer B · automation cell
Phase C · RFP / bid

A proposal timing question raised by the program office, with cross-team inputs due before the industry event. Owners and dates threaded · never the proposal body.

Next: proposal timing reply · midweek
Customer C · launch tooling
Phase H · Lifecycle support

A field-engineer schedule and a spare-parts cadence to coordinate. A quiet program with a steady relationship and a long tail of follow-ups.

Next: field-engineer window · Friday
Ready when you are
Setup is done. Customer A is already threaded and the week's readout is drafted for your review.
You always send. We never do.
Continue to your week → Replay the walk-through